Crown Court v Magistrates
      The crown court is a serious court
      
      The family court and magistrates courts 
      are a bad joke of negligence and open perjury.
A story of Justice v Injustices....
1. See magistrates page first.
Reminder -
The magistrates court had found me guilty of assault for:
1) Protecting my child from an assault,
2) Protecting myself after me being assaulted 
by a mum who had assaulted us all for years.
You have to understand that these magistrates 
      are not very clever people who rule over us mortals - 
      - 
      actually, evidence to date is damning
 
      - that they are grossly incompetent. 
2. Crown Court Appeal.
  I appealed and was acquited
 
      when the case went to Chester Crown Court.
Extract From Summing up. (from Court Transcription) 
        ......
        
Now this all blew up on an occasion when in the middle of the night
 
the little boy started being difficult wanting a drink. 
There was for want of a better phrase a bit of a row about this,
 
it ended up with the appellant going into the bedroom,
 
confronting this situation, his wife was on the bed with the child 
either trying to restrain the child or holding the child forcibly 
as he suggests, he threw the bed covers back and 
she kicked him and her foot made contact with his chin.
 
He then pushed her to the face and it would appear 
that within a short time the situation had calmed down, 
there was no further violence of any kind that night. 
.........
The defendant, the appellant, is a man of good character 
      and we are conscious that that means that
 
      we might be more likely to believe him on his evidence
 
      than somebody who is not 
      (his wife) 
      and that we may ask ourselves why should he do something like this,
 
      i.e. attack his wife criminally at his stage in life, with a good job 
      and many people who speak very highly of him.
 
      His explanation is that what he did by pushing her away 
      was doing no more than what he considered was reasonable 
      in all the circumstances in order to release his child
 
      who he considered was being 
      unlawfully and incorrectly chastised by her 
      in the circumstances. 
3. TH Judge Barnett
of the secret family court in Chester subsequently says
 
      the violence of mum on the children never happened. 
As well as knowing about the Crown Court and police, 
        he sat and heard a recording of mum slapping and deriding her daughter,
 
        had an email of mum saying she had hit the daughter 
        and frequently shouted at the children 
        allowing them to fight and leave marks on each other, 
        saw photographs of violence and abuses,
 
        had testimony, 
        had hard evidence of the mum frequently lying to the court,
 
        had hard evidence of perjury by the social workers. 
He says it was merely once that she slapped her daughter.
Judge Barnett reported deliberate lies  in his judgement 
      to protect the authorities.

Judge Barnett is a criminal who 
        covers up child abuses,
        covers up domestic violence,
        approves of repeated thefts,
        
        commits perjury 
        allows perjury 
        and abuses children
I ask that TH Judge Barnett 
      be brought to account.
He has brought dishonour to the court 
      and further abuses to the children. 
4. Probation.
After leaving the court, I was contacted almost immediately 
      by phone. Probabation reported that they had destroyed 
      all of my case files. 
They can try to hide what they initially said and did,
      but I still have most of th files and a witness......
5. Police.
The police said they could not prosecute my ex wife
 
      for all of this domestic violence 
      and the assault on our toddler 
      and the assault on me 
      because of the legal technicality - 
      -  
      that the time was over six months. 

The police had promoted domestic violence 
      and the victimisation of the victims
 
      (totally without regret or apology). 
6. Social services.
In a meeting after this court case, 
      with school teacher's present, 
      social worker Barbra Goldsmith 
      asked Averice ( mum ) if she had ever hit the children. 
Averice told the group that unequivically 
      she had never hit her children. 
As dad  proceeded to get out his laptop
        which had 
        pictures, 
        video 
        and audio recordings
 
        of Averice abusing the children, 
        Averice ran from the room crying. 
7. Social services.
 In another incident where mum 
      had terrorised Alice  into a fit
 
      (with neighbours present as witnesses),
 
      the social worker Barbra Goldsmith 
      gave mum a severe telling off.
 Later social workers -
        - 
      Andrea Blears 
      - 
      and Helen Jones
       tried repeatedly to cover up 
      social services negligence
 
      and reported frequently 
      that the abuses never happened. 
Click here for a table of evidence - 
      various documents that show the domestic violence, 
      domestic abuse and corruption.
You can help rescue the children and bring these criminals to justice - from your computer - Page with email addresses. .
Also link here to know more About Moral Propositions.
  